2+
independent signals required for any badge
measured
Live Intent
Know who's actually moving. Never on one signal.
The Intent Radar reads real product behavior (resume freshness, ATS activity, open-to-work stance, stated goals) and marks candidates as actively switching or warming up, with a hard rule: no badge ever lights from a single signal, and every badge explains its legs. It deepens what you already see; it never widens who you can see.
0
orgs ever named in demand signals (counts only)
measured
Two legs minimum, always
A badge requires at least two independent signals (a stance plus a behavior), because one signal lies. Someone browsing after buying a pass is not 'actively switching', and the radar knows the difference.
Explained, not oracular
Every badge opens into its evidence: which legs lit it and when. Recruiters calibrate trust because nothing is a mystery score.
Consent-shaped by construction
Signals render only for candidates already visible to your org under their current consent. Demand signals show counts, never which other orgs, and the store subtracts you from your own view.
Movers as a working view
The Movers view collects currently-active candidates with honest capped counts, a daily sourcing starting point that is actually true.
Versus Naukri's last-active dates and LinkedIn's open-to-work ring
A last-active date tells you someone opened an app; a green ring is self-declared once. The radar reads behavior from an owned consumer platform (resume edits, score checks, real goals), demands multiple corroborating legs, and shows its evidence, intent as a checked claim rather than a guess.
How it works
- 1Candidates act on the consumer platform; consented signals coarsen into the radar.
- 2Badges light only on multiple corroborating legs.
- 3Open a badge to read its evidence.
- 4Work the Movers view while intent is real.
Questions, answered
Can the radar show me candidates I couldn't otherwise see?
No, by design. It only deepens context on candidates already visible under their consent settings. Widening reach is exactly what it refuses to do, per DPDP posture.
Why not fire on a single strong signal?
Because single signals mislead: a resume edit might be a typo fix, a pass purchase might be browsing. Two independent legs (stance plus behavior) is the floor for calling someone 'moving', and the badge still shows its work.
Do candidates know about intent signals?
Signals derive only from consented visibility, and the demand side is aggregate counts with viewer subtraction, never naming orgs. The radar's data path was designed with the consent audit, not after it.
Related:Talent Search CopilotSourcing AgentCandidate Dossier
Candidate-Intent Radar
Rolling out; included with Growth and Scale AI features. Start free; upgrade when the volume does.