1
artifact holding slate, ratings, and rationale
measured
HM Review
Shortlists hiring managers actually respond to.
Shortlists are collaborative review workspaces, not saved lists: hiring managers rate candidates with stars, leave threaded comments, and see an AI brief of the whole slate. Share access with reviewers who are not full seats, track review progress per person, and export a print-ready packet when a decision needs a paper trail.
0
seats required for a hiring manager to review
measured
Review, not just storage
Star ratings, decision states, per-candidate and thread comments, reordering, and an activity feed make the shortlist a decision artifact with its own history.
An AI brief of the slate
The copilot brief reads the shortlist and narrates it for a hiring manager: who stands out, where the trade-offs sit. Generated fresh on demand, because shortlists change with every rating.
Share without seats
Per-user access grants let a hiring manager review without occupying a full seat; their ratings and comments land in the same record.
Export the decision
The export packet renders the slate, ratings, and comment trail behind a confidential banner, ready for the stakeholders who still live in PDF.
Versus Naukri folders and LinkedIn Recruiter projects
Folders hold names; decisions happen in email threads that vanish. A Neuradesk shortlist carries the ratings, the argument, and the AI-briefed context in one shareable artifact, so the 'why' of a hire survives the meeting.
How it works
- 1Build the slate from search, pipelines, or the screening room.
- 2Share with the hiring manager; they rate and comment inline.
- 3Read the AI brief for the slate's shape and trade-offs.
- 4Decide, export the packet, and move winners into the pipeline.
Questions, answered
Do hiring managers need a Neuradesk seat?
No. Share grants give reviewers scoped access to the shortlist itself; ratings and comments flow back without a full seat. Full pipeline control still requires membership.
Is the AI brief cached?
Deliberately not: a shortlist changes with nearly every rating and comment, so the brief is generated on demand from the current state. Stale summaries are worse than none.
What ends up in the export packet?
The slate with ratings, decision states, and the full comment trail, including recruiter-private notes, behind a confidential banner. It is the meeting's paper trail, so it is complete.
Related:Candidate DossierThe Screening RoomHiring Intelligence